자폐권리운동: 두 판 사이의 차이
잔글
→관점
잔글편집 요약 없음 |
잔글 (→관점) |
||
| 34번째 줄: | 34번째 줄: | ||
=== 자폐 사용자에게는 고유 문화가 있다 === | === 자폐 사용자에게는 고유 문화가 있다 === | ||
{{further|Autistic culture|Autistic art}} | |||
Some autistic activists suggest that life with autism is very much like being born among people who speak a different language, have a religion or philosophy one does not share and live a lifestyle that feels alien. To put it differently, Autists have an individual culture that's often very different from their environment.{{citation needed|date=February 2015}} | |||
=== 자폐 당사자도 자폐와 관련된 논의에 포함되어야 한다 === | === 자폐 당사자도 자폐와 관련된 논의에 포함되어야 한다 === | ||
A common theme expressed among autism rights activists and neurodiversity groups is that they are different from parent- and professional- led organizations and conferences that dominate the autism scene. Michelle Dawson criticizes the norm of allowing parents to speak on behalf of their autistic children at conferences to the exclusion of autistics. "With the happy and proud collaboration of governments, courts, researchers, service providers, and funding bodies," she says, "parents have succeeded in removing autistics from the vicinity of any important discussions or decisions." This exclusion results in policy and treatment decisions being made solely by individuals who do not directly experience autism.<ref name="Bettelheim"/> | |||
Jim Sinclair states that autism conferences are traditionally geared toward neurotypical parents and professionals, and that to an autistic person they may be quite "hostile" in terms of sensory stimulation and rigidity.<ref name="ANIHist"/> | |||
In defiance of the common complaint that anti-cure advocates' ability to articulate complex opinions in writing—which some critics see as being impossible for autistic people<ref name="Dawson"/>—autistic adults such as Amanda Baggs use their own writing and videos to demonstrate that it is possible for severely disabled autistics to be autism rights advocates.<ref name=Wolman>Wolman, David. [https://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-03/ff_autism The Truth About Autism: Scientists Reconsider What They Think They Know]. Retrieved on 2010-05.20.</ref> She says that when the critics assume that intelligent and articulate autistic people do not have difficulties like self-injurious behavior and difficulty with self-care, they affect the opinions of policy makers and make it more difficult for intelligent and articulate autistic people to get services. Baggs cites an example of an autistic person who was denied services when it was discovered that she could type.<ref name=BaggsToKit>{{cite web|author=Baggs, AM |year=2005 |url=http://www.autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html |title=To the Kit Weintraubs of the World |publisher=Autistics.org |accessdate=2007-11-07 |authorlink=Amanda Baggs| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071013143015/http://autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html| archivedate= 13 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> | |||
=== 자폐 요법 상당수가 비윤리적이다 === | === 자폐 요법 상당수가 비윤리적이다 === | ||
{{further|Autism therapies}} | |||
[[Aspies For Freedom]] stated that the most common therapies for autism are unethical, since they focus on extinguishing harmless [[stimming]], forcing [[eye contact]] and breaking routines. AFF argued that [[Applied Behavior Analysis|ABA]] therapy and restriction of stimming "and other autistic coping mechanisms" are mentally harmful, that [[aversion therapy]] and the use of restraints are physically harmful, and that alternative treatments like [[chelation]] are dangerous.<ref name="AFF"/> [[Michelle Dawson]], a Canadian autism self-advocate, testified in court against government funding of ABA therapy.<ref name=Dawson /> An autistic person named Jane Meyerding criticized therapy which attempts to remove autistic behaviors because she says that the behaviors that the therapy tries to remove are attempts to communicate.<ref name="Harmon"/> | |||
=== 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 === | === 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 === | ||