코팅리 요정: 두 판 사이의 차이

코팅리 요정 (원본 보기)

2021년 7월 6일 (화) 14:04 판

212 바이트 추가됨 , 2021년 7월 6일 (화)

편집 요약 없음

Ellif

사무관, 인터페이스 관리자, 관리자

편집

7,241

번

@@ 20번째 줄: / 20번째 줄: @@
 가드너는 원래 촬영한 네거티브 유리판과 함께 프린트를 사진 전문가인 해럴드 스넬링(Harold Snelling)에게 보냈다. 스넬링은 ‘두 네거티브는 완전히 진본이며, 판지나 종이 모델을 사진에 포함시킨 흔적이 아무것도 없다는 [점에서] … 진짜 사진이다’는 의견을 냈다{{Sfn|Magnusson|2006|pp=99}}. 다만 그는 사진이 페어리를 보여 주었다고 말하기 보다는, ‘이 사진들은 그 당시에 카메라 앞에 있던 것을 곧바로 찍은 것들’이라고만 표현했다{{Sfn|Smith|2007|p=389}}. 가드너는 프린트가 스넬링에 의해 ‘확증되게’ 한 이후, 영국 전역에서 진행한 묘사 강의를 진행하기 위해 ’인쇄하기에 더욱 도움이 되는’ 새 네거티브 원판을 만들어냈다{{Sfn|Magnusson|2006|pp=98-99}}{{Sfn|Smith|2007|p=382}}. 스넬링도 가드너의 강연에서 판매하기 위한 사진 프린트를 공급했다{{Sfn|Smith|2007|p=401}}<ref>{{기사 인용|성=Crawley|이름=Geoffrey|제목=More to Discover about Fairies|뉴스=[[타임스|The Times]]|날짜=1983-04-09}}/ref>.
-작가이자 유명한 심령술사인 [[아서 코난 도일]]경은
+작가이자 유명한 심령술사인 [[아서 코난 도일]]경은 심령주의자들의 잡지 ‘빛’(Light)의 편집자로부터 사진을 알게 됐다{{Sfn|Smith|2007|p=383}}. 이 때 [[스트랜드 매거진]]이 아서에게 크리스마스 특집호에 페어리에 대한 글을 써달라는 요청을 받았고, 방송인이자 역사가인 [[마그누스 마그누손]](Magnus Magnusson)에 따르면 이 페어리 사진은 “하나님이 보내주신”(seemed like a godsend)듯했다. 도일은 사진의 배경에 대해 확인하기 위해 1920년 6월에 가드너에게 연락했으며, 그의 기사에 사진을 사용해도 될지 허락을 받기 위해 엘시와 그의 아버지에게도 연락했다. 아서 라이트는 도일이 개입한 것에 대해 ‘분명하게 감명을 받고’, 그에게 출판 허락을 주었다. 다만 그는 이것이 실제 사진이라면, 이미지가 돈에 ‘더럽혀져’서는 안된다는 사실에 기반에 돈을 받기를 거부했다{{Sfn|Magnusson|2006|pp=99-100}}.
+<!--Gardner and Doyle sought a second expert opinion from the photographic company Kodak. Several of the company's technicians examined the enhanced prints, and although they agreed with Snelling that the pictures "showed no signs of being faked", they concluded that "this could not be taken as conclusive evidence ... that they were authentic photographs of fairies".[14] Kodak declined to issue a certificate of authenticity.[15] Gardner believed that the Kodak technicians might not have examined the photographs entirely objectively, observing that one had commented "after all, as fairies couldn't be true, the photographs must have been faked somehow".[16] The prints were also examined by another photographic company, Ilford, who reported unequivocally that there was "some evidence of faking".[16] Gardner and Doyle, perhaps rather optimistically, interpreted the results of the three expert evaluations as two in favour of the photographs' authenticity and one against.[16]
-<!--Author and prominent spiritualist Sir Arthur Conan Doyle learned of the photographs from the editor of the spiritualist publication Light.[12] Doyle had been commissioned by The Strand Magazine to write an article on fairies for their Christmas issue, and the fairy photographs "must have seemed like a godsend" according to broadcaster and historian Magnus Magnusson. Doyle contacted Gardner in June 1920 to determine the background to the photographs, and wrote to Elsie and her father to request permission from the latter to use the prints in his article. Arthur Wright was "obviously impressed" that Doyle was involved, and gave his permission for publication, but he refused payment on the grounds that, if genuine, the images should not be "soiled" by money.[13]
-Gardner and Doyle sought a second expert opinion from the photographic company Kodak. Several of the company's technicians examined the enhanced prints, and although they agreed with Snelling that the pictures "showed no signs of being faked", they concluded that "this could not be taken as conclusive evidence ... that they were authentic photographs of fairies".[14] Kodak declined to issue a certificate of authenticity.[15] Gardner believed that the Kodak technicians might not have examined the photographs entirely objectively, observing that one had commented "after all, as fairies couldn't be true, the photographs must have been faked somehow".[16] The prints were also examined by another photographic company, Ilford, who reported unequivocally that there was "some evidence of faking".[16] Gardner and Doyle, perhaps rather optimistically, interpreted the results of the three expert evaluations as two in favour of the photographs' authenticity and one against.[16]
 Doyle also showed the photographs to the physicist and pioneering psychical researcher Sir Oliver Lodge, who believed the photographs to be fake. He suggested that a troupe of dancers had masqueraded as fairies, and expressed doubt as to their "distinctly 'Parisienne'" hairstyles.[15] -->
@@ 45번째 줄: / 42번째 줄: @@
 * {{책 인용|언어고리=en|성=Prashad|이름=Sukhadev|년도=2008|제목=World Famous Supernatural Mysteries|출판사=Pustak Mahal|ISBN=978-81-223-0559-3|ref=CITEREFPrashad2008}}
 * {{책 인용|언어고리=en|성=Doyle|이름=Sir Arthur Conan|연도=1922|제목=The Coming of the Fairies|출판사=George H.Dohan Company|ref=CITEREFDoyle1922|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/47506/47506-h/47506-h.htm}}
-* {{책 인용|언어고리=en|성=Smith|이름=Paul|연도=1997|장=The Cottingley Fairies: The End of a Legend|편집자=Narváez, Peter|책=The Good People: New Fairylore Essays|출판사=The University Press of Kentucky|쪽=371–405|ISBN= 978-0-8131-0939-8|Ref=CITEREFSmith1997}}
+* {{책 인용|언어고리=en|성=Smith|이름=Paul|연도=1997|장=The Cottingley Fairies: The End of a Legend|편집자=Narváez, Peter|제목=The Good People: New Fairylore Essays|출판사=The University Press of Kentucky|쪽=371–405|ISBN= 978-0-8131-0939-8|Ref=CITEREFSmith1997}}
 == 바깥고리 ==