자폐권리운동: 두 판 사이의 차이
→관점
잔글편집 요약 없음 |
(→관점) |
||
18번째 줄: | 18번째 줄: | ||
== 관점 == | == 관점 == | ||
몇몇 자폐인권 활동가들은 자폐적 특성으로 서술되고 있는 몇몇 특징은 단순한 오해라고 믿고 있다<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=http://isnt.autistics.org/ |title=What is NT? |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date=2002-03-18 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017031902/http://isnt.autistics.org/| archivedate= 17 October 2007}}</ref>. 미셸 다우슨은 자폐인들 중 75%의 지능이 낮다는 믿음에 반박했으며<ref name=RogerCollier>{{웹 인용|성=Collier|이름=Roger|제목=Autism|출판사=The Ottawa Citizen|url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=71fae5dc-7eb5-48fd-8f60-78deebee9879&p=1|날짜=2007-12-01|확인일자=2008-02-17}}</ref>, | 몇몇 자폐인권 활동가들은 자폐적 특성으로 서술되고 있는 몇몇 특징은 단순한 오해라고 믿고 있다<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=http://isnt.autistics.org/ |title=What is NT? |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date=2002-03-18 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017031902/http://isnt.autistics.org/| archivedate= 17 October 2007}}</ref>. 미셸 다우슨은 자폐인들 중 75%의 지능이 낮다는 믿음에 반박했으며<ref name=RogerCollier>{{웹 인용|성=Collier|이름=Roger|제목=Autism|출판사=The Ottawa Citizen|url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=71fae5dc-7eb5-48fd-8f60-78deebee9879&p=1|날짜=2007-12-01|확인일자=2008-02-17}}</ref>, 영국 [[전국자폐협회]](NAS)는 영국 내에서 [[지적장애]]를 동반한 자폐인의 비율을 44~52%로 보고 있다<ref name=nas_myth>{{웹 인용|url=http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/myths-facts-stats.aspx|저자=[[전국자폐협회]]|제목=Autism facts and history|확인일자=2018-04-23}}</ref>. 몬트리올 출신의 정신의학 의사 '''로랭 모트론'''(Laurent Mottron)도 자폐성 장애인들이 일반적인 IQ 테스트 결과보다 무언어 [[요약추론]] 테스트 결과가 더 좋다고 지적하고 있다<ref name=Bower>{{웹 인용 |이름=Bower|성=Bruce| |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp |title=Hidden Smarts: Abstract thought trumps IQ scores in autism |publisher=Science News Online |date=2007-07-07 |accessdate=2007-11-08 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012225228/http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp |archivedate=2007-10-12 |volume=172 |issue=1 |page=4 }}</ref>. | ||
|publisher=Science News Online | |||
|archivedate=2007-10-12 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
Some autistics have claimed that non-autistics are insensitive to ''their'' perspectives, and write [[parody|parodies]] based on this, addressing what they call [[allism]] (a lack of autism) as a mental disorder characterized by lack of "theory of other minds".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/salanne.html |title=The Sal and Anne Test: Implications, and Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date= 1998-09-26|accessdate=2012-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/theory_of_mind.html |title=NT Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |accessdate=2012-11-03}}</ref> | Some autistics have claimed that non-autistics are insensitive to ''their'' perspectives, and write [[parody|parodies]] based on this, addressing what they call [[allism]] (a lack of autism) as a mental disorder characterized by lack of "theory of other minds".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/salanne.html |title=The Sal and Anne Test: Implications, and Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date= 1998-09-26|accessdate=2012-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/theory_of_mind.html |title=NT Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |accessdate=2012-11-03}}</ref> |