자폐권리운동: 두 판 사이의 차이

자폐권리운동 (원본 보기)

2018년 4월 23일 (월) 01:51 판

288 바이트 제거됨 , 2018년 4월 23일 (월)

잔글

→‎관점

Ellif

사무관, 인터페이스 관리자, 관리자

편집

7,241

번

@@ 18번째 줄: / 18번째 줄: @@
 == 관점 ==
-몇몇 자폐인권 활동가들은 자폐적 특성으로 서술되고 있는 몇몇 특징은 단순한 오해라고 믿고 있다<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=http://isnt.autistics.org/ |title=What is NT? |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date=2002-03-18 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017031902/http://isnt.autistics.org/| archivedate= 17 October 2007}}</ref>. 미셸 다우슨은 자폐인들 중 75%의 지능이 낮다는 믿음에 반박했으며<ref name=RogerCollier>{{웹 인용|성=Collier|이름=Roger|제목=Autism|출판사=The Ottawa Citizen|url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=71fae5dc-7eb5-48fd-8f60-78deebee9879&p=1|날짜=2007-12-01|확인일자=2008-02-17}}</ref>, 영국 [[전국자폐협회]](NAS)는 영국 내에서 [[지적장애]]를 동반한 자폐인의 비율을 44~52%로 보고 있다<ref name=nas_myth>{{웹 인용|url=http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/myths-facts-stats.aspx|저자=[[전국자폐협회]]|제목=Autism facts and history|확인일자=2018-04-23}}</ref>. 몬트리올 출신의 정신의학 의사 '''로랭 모트론'''(Laurent Mottron)도 자폐성 장애인들이 일반적인 IQ 테스트 결과보다 무언어 [[요약추론]] 테스트 결과가 더 좋다고 지적하고 있다<ref name=Bower>{{웹 인용 |이름=Bower|성=Bruce| |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp   |title=Hidden Smarts: Abstract thought trumps IQ scores in autism  |publisher=Science News Online |date=2007-07-07 |accessdate=2007-11-08 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012225228/http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp  |archivedate=2007-10-12 |volume=172 |issue=1 |page=4 }}</ref>.
+몇몇 자폐인권 활동가들은 자폐적 특성으로 서술되고 있는 몇몇 특징들이 단순한 오해라고 믿고 있다<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=http://isnt.autistics.org/ |title=What is NT? |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date=2002-03-18 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071017031902/http://isnt.autistics.org/| archivedate= 17 October 2007}}</ref>. 미셸 다우슨은 자폐인들 중 75%의 지능이 낮다는 믿음에 반박했으며<ref name=RogerCollier>{{웹 인용|성=Collier|이름=Roger|제목=Autism|출판사=The Ottawa Citizen|url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=71fae5dc-7eb5-48fd-8f60-78deebee9879&p=1|날짜=2007-12-01|확인일자=2008-02-17}}</ref>, 영국 [[전국자폐협회]](NAS)는 영국 내에서 [[지적장애]]를 동반한 자폐인의 비율을 44~52%로 보고 있다<ref name=nas_myth>{{웹 인용|url=http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/myths-facts-stats.aspx|저자=[[전국자폐협회]]|제목=Autism facts and history|확인일자=2018-04-23}}</ref>. 몬트리올 출신의 정신의학 의사 '''로랭 모트론'''(Laurent Mottron)도 자폐성 장애인들이 일반적인 IQ 테스트 결과보다 무언어 [[요약추론]] 테스트 결과가 더 좋다고 지적하고 있다<ref name=Bower>{{웹 인용 |이름=Bower|성=Bruce| |url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp |title=Hidden Smarts: Abstract thought trumps IQ scores in autism  |publisher=Science News Online |date=2007-07-07 |accessdate=2007-11-08 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012225228/http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070707/fob4.asp  |archivedate=2007-10-12 |volume=172 |issue=1 |page=4 }}</ref>.
-Some autistics have claimed that non-autistics are insensitive to ''their'' perspectives, and write [[parody|parodies]] based on this, addressing what they call [[allism]] (a lack of autism) as a mental disorder characterized by lack of "theory of other minds".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/salanne.html |title=The Sal and Anne Test: Implications, and Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date= 1998-09-26|accessdate=2012-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/theory_of_mind.html |title=NT Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |accessdate=2012-11-03}}</ref>
+더 나아가 몇몇 활동가들은 자폐적 삶을 정상으로, 일반인을 비정상인으로 규정하기도 한다. 몇몇 자폐인은 비자폐인 자신의 감각이 둔하다고 주장하며, 이들 모두가 "다른 [[마음 이론]]"이 부족한 특성을 지닌 [[정신장애]]인 [[무자폐]](Allism)인이라고 설명하면서, 이러한 믿음에 기반한 패러디 글을 작성하기도 한다<ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/salanne.html |title=The Sal and Anne Test: Implications, and Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |date= 1998-09-26|accessdate=2012-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://hem.spray.se/erik.engdahl/autism/isnt/theory_of_mind.html |title=NT Theory of Mind |publisher=Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical |accessdate=2012-11-03}}</ref>. 일찍부터 동일한 비판의 대상이 되어 온 짐 신클레어도, "자기옹호 반대편의 정치"에 대해 세세하게 설명해 왔다.
-[[Jim Sinclair (activist)|Jim Sinclair]], who has also been a target of similar criticism from very early on, goes into detail about "the politics of opposition to self-advocacy".<ref name=ANIHistory>{{cite web |url=http://web.syr.edu/~jisincla/History_of_ANI.html  |title=Autism Network International: The Development of a Community and its Culture |author=Sinclair, Jim |date=January 2005 |publisher=Jim Sinclair's personal website |accessdate=2007-11-07 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20070826110842/http://web.syr.edu/~jisincla/History_of_ANI.html |archivedate = 2007-08-26}}</ref>
 The controversy has erupted on autism e-mail lists, where "curebie" is used as a derogatory term for parents who are portrayed as "slaves to conformity, so anxious for their children to appear normal that they cannot respect their way of communicating".<ref name="Harmon"/>  These parents respond that this attitude shows "a typical autistic lack of empathy by suggesting that they should not try to help their children". Lenny Schafer said that the autism-like lack of [[empathy]] of anti-cure activists prevent them from seeing what is in the hearts of pro-cure advocates.<ref>Schafer, Lenny. [https://web.archive.org/web/20050507231402/http://lists.envirolink.org/pipermail/sareport/Week-of-Mon-20050110/000350.html "Response to Letters: Somewhere Over the Spectrum, Part 3."] Volume 9 Number 5. (January 2005). Retrieved on 2008-01-04.</ref>