본문으로 이동

자폐권리운동: 두 판 사이의 차이

자폐권리운동 (원본 보기)

2018년 5월 4일 (금) 21:05 판

321 바이트 추가됨 ,  2018년 5월 4일 (금)
잔글
→‎자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다
잔글 (→‎관점)
45번째 줄: 45번째 줄:


=== 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 ===
=== 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 ===
자폐인권운동 속에 있는 사람들이 자폐를 장애가 아니라 자연스러운 인간의 변형으로 보기 때문에, 자폐를 없애고자 하는 시도에 반대한다. 특히, 이들 중 몇몇은 태어난 이후에도 자폐가 일어날 수 있다고 믿기 때문에, 태어나지 않은 상태에서 자폐 여부를 유전적으로 검사하는 데에 대해 반대한하며, 자폐 당사자가 태어나는 것을 막을 수 있다고 걱정한다<ref name="Harmon"/>.
자폐인권운동 속에 있는 사람들이 자폐를 장애가 아니라 자연스러운 인간의 변형으로 보기 때문에, 자폐를 없애고자 하는 시도에 반대한다. 특히, 이들 중 몇몇은 태어난 이후에도 자폐가 일어날 수 있다고 믿기 때문에, 태어나지 않은 상태에서 자폐 여부를 유전적으로 검사하는 데에 대해 반대하며, 몇몇은 이 검사를 통해 자폐 당사자가 태어나는 것을 막을 수 있다고 걱정한다<ref name="Harmon"/>. 2005년 1월 23일,자폐


Since those in the autism rights movement see autism as a natural human variation and not a disorder, they are opposed to attempts to eliminate autism. In particular, there is opposition to prenatal genetic testing of autism in unborn fetuses, which some believe might be possible in the future (see [[Heritability of autism]]). Some worry that this can prevent autistic people from being born. On February 23, 2005 Joseph Buxbaum of the [[Autism Genome Project]] at the [[Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai]] said there could be a prenatal test for autism within 10 years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Herrera, Sue |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7013251 |title=Autism research focuses on early intervention:  Genetic clues sought in fight against disorder |publisher=MSNBC |date=2005-02-23|accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071026043242/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7013251| archivedate= 26 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> However, the [[causes of autism|genetics of autism]] have proven to be extremely complex.<ref name=Freitag>{{cite journal |author=Freitag CM |title=The genetics of autistic disorders and its clinical relevance: a review of the literature |journal=Mol Psychiatry |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=2–22 |year=2007 |doi=10.1038/sj.mp.4001896 |pmid=17033636 |url=http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v12/n1/full/4001896a.html}}</ref> In any case, the Autistic Genocide Clock was started in response to this, which counts down to 10 years after Buxbaum made this announcement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ventura33.com/clock/ |title=The Autistic Genocide Clock |publisher=Ventura33 FanFiction |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071015072038/http://ventura33.com/clock/| archivedate= 15 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>  The public has started to debate the [[ethics]] involved in the possible elimination of a [[genotype]] that has liabilities and advantages, which may be seen as tampering with [[natural selection]].<ref>{{cite web |publisher= [[MSNBC]] |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7899821/ |title=Would you have allowed Bill Gates to be born? Advances in prenatal genetic testing pose tough questions |author=Caplan, Arthur |date=2005-05-31 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071112165824/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7899821/| archivedate= 12 November 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>
Since those in the autism rights movement see autism as a natural human variation and not a disorder, they are opposed to attempts to eliminate autism. In particular, there is opposition to prenatal genetic testing of autism in unborn fetuses, which some believe might be possible in the future (see [[Heritability of autism]]). Some worry that this can prevent autistic people from being born. On February 23, 2005 Joseph Buxbaum of the [[Autism Genome Project]] at the [[Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai]] said there could be a prenatal test for autism within 10 years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Herrera, Sue |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7013251 |title=Autism research focuses on early intervention:  Genetic clues sought in fight against disorder |publisher=MSNBC |date=2005-02-23|accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071026043242/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7013251| archivedate= 26 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> However, the [[causes of autism|genetics of autism]] have proven to be extremely complex.<ref name=Freitag>{{cite journal |author=Freitag CM |title=The genetics of autistic disorders and its clinical relevance: a review of the literature |journal=Mol Psychiatry |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=2–22 |year=2007 |doi=10.1038/sj.mp.4001896 |pmid=17033636 |url=http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v12/n1/full/4001896a.html}}</ref> In any case, the Autistic Genocide Clock was started in response to this, which counts down to 10 years after Buxbaum made this announcement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ventura33.com/clock/ |title=The Autistic Genocide Clock |publisher=Ventura33 FanFiction |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071015072038/http://ventura33.com/clock/| archivedate= 15 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>  The public has started to debate the [[ethics]] involved in the possible elimination of a [[genotype]] that has liabilities and advantages, which may be seen as tampering with [[natural selection]].<ref>{{cite web |publisher= [[MSNBC]] |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7899821/ |title=Would you have allowed Bill Gates to be born? Advances in prenatal genetic testing pose tough questions |author=Caplan, Arthur |date=2005-05-31 |accessdate=2007-11-07| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071112165824/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7899821/| archivedate= 12 November 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>


Some people lament that professionals, such as social workers, may discourage autistics from having children.<ref name=TrivediProud>{{cite journal |title=Autistic and proud of it |year=2005 |journal=New Scientist |author=Trivedi B|issue=2504 |page=36}}</ref> Some are concerned that the "ultimate cure will be a genetic test to prevent autistic children from being born"<ref name="Harmon"/> and that most autistic fetuses would be aborted if prenatal tests for autism are developed.<ref name=SanerDisease>{{cite news|author=Saner E |title=It is not a disease, it is a way of life |work=The Guardian |date=2007-08-07 |url=http://society.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0,,2143123,00.html |accessdate=2007-08-07 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070820055604/http://society.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0%2C%2C2143123%2C00.html |archivedate=20 August 2007 |deadurl=no }}</ref>
사회복지 공무원들 같은 전문가들이 자폐성 장애인들이 어린이를 낳는 것을 금지할 수 있다는 점을 한탄한다<ref name=TrivediProud>{{언어고리|en}} {{논문 인용|날짜=2005-06-15|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18625041-500-autistic-and-proud-of-it/|title=Autistic and proud of it |year=2005 |journal=New Scientist |성=Trivedi |이름=Bijal|issue=2504 |page=36}}</ref>. 몇몇은 "긍극적인 치료는 유전가 검사를 통해 자폐성 장애 아동이 낳아지는 것을 막는 것이 될 것이다"라며<ref name="Harmon"/> 자폐에 대한 산전 검사 기술이 발전된다면 대부분의 자폐를 가진 태아들이 유산될 것이라고 염려한다<ref name=SanerDisease>{{언어고리|en}} {{기사 인용|author=Saner E |title=It is not a disease, it is a way of life |work=The Guardian |date=2007-08-07 |url=http://society.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0,,2143123,00.html |accessdate=2007-08-07 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070820055604/http://society.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0%2C%2C2143123%2C00.html |archivedate=20 August 2007 |deadurl=no }}</ref>.


=== 자폐 '치료'라는 개념은 모욕적이다 ===
=== 자폐 '치료'라는 개념은 모욕적이다 ===
원본 주소 "https://wiki.1if.in/wiki/특수:모바일차이/3408"