편집
7,241
번
→관점
잔글 (→관점) |
(→관점) |
||
| 32번째 줄: | 32번째 줄: | ||
=== 자폐 사용자에게는 고유 문화가 있다 === | === 자폐 사용자에게는 고유 문화가 있다 === | ||
몇몇 자폐 활동가들은 자폐가 다른 언어를 | 몇몇 자폐 활동가들은 자폐가 다른 언어를 말하거나 다른 종교나 철학을 가진 사람들 사이에 태어나 외계에서 사는 것 같은 느낌을 받는 것과 매우 비슷하다고 주장한다. 다시말해, 자폐 당사자들은 때때로 살아가는 환경과 매우 다른 개인 문화를 가지고 있다는 것이다. | ||
=== 자폐 당사자도 자폐와 관련된 논의에 포함되어야 한다 === | === 자폐 당사자도 자폐와 관련된 논의에 포함되어야 한다 === | ||
자폐 인권 행동가들과 신경다양성 그룹들 사이에서 표현되는 주요 주제중 하나는 자신들이 현재 자폐판을 주도하는 부모나 전문가가 이끄는 단체들과 모임들과 다르다는 것이다. 미셀 다우슨은 자폐 당사자를 배재한 채 컨퍼런스에서 자기 자폐 아이를 대신해 말하는 부모들을 허용하는 현재의 규범을 비판한다. 그녀는 "행정부, 법원, 연구가, 서비스 제공자와 모금 단체들과 행복하고 자랑스러운 협력을 통해, 부모들은 자폐와 관련해 발생되는 중요한 토론과 결정에서 자폐 당사자가 주변에 얼씬도 하지 못하도록 하는데 성공해 왔다"고 발언했다. 이러한 제외는 자폐를 직접적으로 경험하지 못한 사람들만에 의해 정책이나 치료와 관련된 결정이 나오는 결과를 일으킨다<ref name="Bettelheim"/>. 짐 신클레어도 자폐 컨퍼런스들이 전통적으로 일반신경적 부모들과 전문가들에 맟춰져 왔다며, 이것이 자폐 당사자들에게는 감각 자극이나 경직성 측면에서 꽤 '적대적일'수 있다고 말한다<ref name="ANIHist"/>. | |||
In defiance of the common complaint that anti-cure advocates' ability to articulate complex opinions in writing—which some critics see as being impossible for autistic people<ref name="Dawson"/>—autistic adults such as Amanda Baggs use their own writing and videos to demonstrate that it is possible for severely disabled autistics to be autism rights advocates.<ref name=Wolman>Wolman, David. [https://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-03/ff_autism The Truth About Autism: Scientists Reconsider What They Think They Know]. Retrieved on 2010-05.20.</ref> She says that when the critics assume that intelligent and articulate autistic people do not have difficulties like self-injurious behavior and difficulty with self-care, they affect the opinions of policy makers and make it more difficult for intelligent and articulate autistic people to get services. Baggs cites an example of an autistic person who was denied services when it was discovered that she could type.<ref name=BaggsToKit>{{cite web|author=Baggs, AM |year=2005 |url=http://www.autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html |title=To the Kit Weintraubs of the World |publisher=Autistics.org |accessdate=2007-11-07 |authorlink=Amanda Baggs| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071013143015/http://autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html| archivedate= 13 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> | In defiance of the common complaint that anti-cure advocates' ability to articulate complex opinions in writing—which some critics see as being impossible for autistic people<ref name="Dawson"/>—autistic adults such as Amanda Baggs use their own writing and videos to demonstrate that it is possible for severely disabled autistics to be autism rights advocates.<ref name=Wolman>Wolman, David. [https://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-03/ff_autism The Truth About Autism: Scientists Reconsider What They Think They Know]. Retrieved on 2010-05.20.</ref> She says that when the critics assume that intelligent and articulate autistic people do not have difficulties like self-injurious behavior and difficulty with self-care, they affect the opinions of policy makers and make it more difficult for intelligent and articulate autistic people to get services. Baggs cites an example of an autistic person who was denied services when it was discovered that she could type.<ref name=BaggsToKit>{{cite web|author=Baggs, AM |year=2005 |url=http://www.autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html |title=To the Kit Weintraubs of the World |publisher=Autistics.org |accessdate=2007-11-07 |authorlink=Amanda Baggs| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20071013143015/http://autistics.org/library/ambweintraub.html| archivedate= 13 October 2007 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> | ||
| 48번째 줄: | 44번째 줄: | ||
[[Aspies For Freedom]] stated that the most common therapies for autism are unethical, since they focus on extinguishing harmless [[stimming]], forcing [[eye contact]] and breaking routines. AFF argued that [[Applied Behavior Analysis|ABA]] therapy and restriction of stimming "and other autistic coping mechanisms" are mentally harmful, that [[aversion therapy]] and the use of restraints are physically harmful, and that alternative treatments like [[chelation]] are dangerous.<ref name="AFF"/> [[Michelle Dawson]], a Canadian autism self-advocate, testified in court against government funding of ABA therapy.<ref name=Dawson /> An autistic person named Jane Meyerding criticized therapy which attempts to remove autistic behaviors because she says that the behaviors that the therapy tries to remove are attempts to communicate.<ref name="Harmon"/> | [[Aspies For Freedom]] stated that the most common therapies for autism are unethical, since they focus on extinguishing harmless [[stimming]], forcing [[eye contact]] and breaking routines. AFF argued that [[Applied Behavior Analysis|ABA]] therapy and restriction of stimming "and other autistic coping mechanisms" are mentally harmful, that [[aversion therapy]] and the use of restraints are physically harmful, and that alternative treatments like [[chelation]] are dangerous.<ref name="AFF"/> [[Michelle Dawson]], a Canadian autism self-advocate, testified in court against government funding of ABA therapy.<ref name=Dawson /> An autistic person named Jane Meyerding criticized therapy which attempts to remove autistic behaviors because she says that the behaviors that the therapy tries to remove are attempts to communicate.<ref name="Harmon"/> | ||
=== 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 === | === 자폐 유전자는 제거되어서는 안 된다 === | ||